The Crisis Of Anti-Zionism

May 5, 2016 § 5 Comments

It’s been a pretty terrible run recently for British politicians who like to wear their opposition to Israel as a badge of honor. The former mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, paved the way for the deluge in the course of defending his colleague Naz Shah – herself suspended for anti-Semitic ravings – with his fever dream conspiracy theory that Hitler supported Zionism “before he went mad.” This opened the floodgates, and now it turns out that fifty Labour Party members have been suspended for anti-Semitism and racism (although dollars to donuts the racism part of the Venn diagram that does not overlap with anti-Semitism is nearly non-existent), with surely more to come. This is before one even begins to mention Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who himself has a dodgy history of giving cover to Hamas and Hizballah, defending 9/11 conspiracy theorists who blame the attacks on the Mossad, and cavorting with Holocaust deniers.

The vitriolic rot is not limited to the other side of the pond. Right here at home, there has been Harvard Law student Husam El-Qoulaq asking Israeli MK and former foreign minister Tzipi Livni why she is “so smelly;” the questioner at the Bernie Sanders rally who asserted that “Zionist Jews” run the U.S. economy and control American political campaigns; the UCLA student who was initially barred from joining the student judicial board because her Jewish heritage would allegedly prevent her from fairly considering cases related to Israel activism and BDS; and countless others. All of this has naturally reinvigorated a long-running debate on whether anti-Semitism can be distinct from anti-Zionism – a topic I briefly weighed in on years ago – and how to oppose Zionism without it bleeding over into opposing Jews writ large.

The question is important both intellectually and practically, but it is the wrong question. The question of the moment shouldn’t be whether anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, but why anti-Zionism as it is being practiced is considered to be within the bounds of acceptability at all, irrespective of the anti-Semitism angle. Whenever someone draws an unwarranted spotlight these days for traversing the thin red line between denouncing Israel versus denouncing Jews, there is an immediate race to say that the offending comments or actions are not anti-Semitic, only anti-Zionist. The unsaid implication is that wholesale delegitimization of Israel is fine so long as it does not extend to Jews as a group, but it is unclear to me why this is somehow seen as a legitimate way of distinguishing cases; the virulence of many of these instances of anti-Zionism is just as ugly as straight anti-Semitism.

Go back and take another look at the various recent examples at the top of this piece. With the exception of the UCLA incident, one can pretty easily make a cogent argument that none of these are anti-Semitic. That doesn’t make them alright. We have arrived at a place where committed anti-Zionists must ask themselves not whether anti-Zionism is anti-Semitic or not, but whether anti-Zionism itself can be sustained in any real way that is not violently and offensively bigoted. Bigotry is the hatred and refusal to accept members of a particular group based on nothing but their inclusion in that group. The most widespread form of anti-Zionism, that seeks to boycott and hound Israelis no matter who they are or where they are, is bigotry, plain and simple. That it is directed at Israelis rather than Jews makes no difference. The laughable refrain that “Israel is the most brutal country on Earth and does not have a right to exist, but hey, I love Jews and have many Jewish friends, and by the way the best Jews are not Zionists” doesn’t send the message that you’re not anti-Semitic. It sends the message that you are a callous bigot, ignorant of history and any sense of factual proportion, who for some reason believes that hating Jews as a group is ok as long as you only hate the group of Jews who live in one particular place.

I will defend anyone’s right to criticize the Israeli government, and I exercise that right myself all the time (almost certainly too much for some readers’ tastes). The notion that some hold of supporting everything Israel does, right or wrong, is not one with which I identify. If the litmus test of what it means to be pro-Israel were applied to talking about the U.S., then literally every American I know would be classified as anti-American. I can understand – although I neither condone it nor agree with it – those who go further than mere criticism and boycott Prime Minister Netanyahu’s appearances because of their harsh disagreement with the Israeli government. But if you think that comparing Netanyahu to Hitler and Israelis to Nazis, or referring to Israeli politicians as olfactory nightmares, or barring Israelis from academic conferences around the world, is simply “criticism” that doesn’t cross a line of what should be acceptable in civilized company, you are badly in need of a history lesson, if not a lobotomy.

For the purposes of this exercise, lets give anti-Zionism the largest possible benefit of the doubt. Perhaps an anti-Zionism that claims to reject nationalism and decries Israel’s right to exist but at the same time endlessly shouts Free Palestine is not anti-Semitic. Perhaps an anti-Zionism that lauds Hamas as anti-colonial freedom fighters while whitewashing its annihilationist rhetoric against Jews – not Israelis, but Jews – is not anti-Semitic. Perhaps an anti-Zionism that has nothing to say about countries that forbid non-Muslims from entering entire cities or enact legislation based on religious law but that harps on Israeli immigration preferences for Jews is not anti-Semitic. Even if you grant all of that, it doesn’t make this anti-Zionism any less noxious, less offensive, less bigoted, or less dangerous. Anti-Semitism is a black scourge upon the face of human history, but the fact that it is singularly terrible does not make other forms of vile hatred any less worse than they actually are.


Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

§ 5 Responses to The Crisis Of Anti-Zionism

  • alan w says:

    Very well written and argued. I imagine you could write pages and pages on this, but you called it out exactly correct. I faced that when I was on campus a few decades ago–where the Jewish editor (a virulent anti Zionist) of the newspaper said “I can’t be anti-Semitic, I’m Jewish” yet published the most race baiting and vile stuff you can imagine.

    I think that the point of anti-Zionism that stands out is that these people focus singularly on Israel. Whether it is human rights record, right to exist, policy, immigration practices, or whatever–they call out NO OTHER COUNTRY’S right to exist or rule as it sees fit. This singular focus on Israel/Zionism and only Israel speaks to me of a disturbing focus and unfair treatment (yes, anti-Semitic too). If these people think that nations should not exist, let them take that up as well–but it seems that only one nation should not exist in any form, or with any policy, and it is unacceptable and very anti-Semitic

  • Lee Crespi says:

    Thank you! Perfectly stated and very much needs to be said.

  • fof9l says:

    I echo the other plaudits for this article. The problem is that the people who most need to read and understand this argument, probably will not, because they are mostly deaf to anything that doesn’t fit their bigoted worldview.

  • Rita Crespi says:

    What amazes me is that people believe the Holocaust could not happen again. Do they think that Hitler and his minions woke up on a Monday morning and said “let’s kill all the Jews in Europe”? It started slowly, a rock thrown through a Jewish butcher’s window……another through a synagogue…..rumors spread that the Jews controlled all the banks, then came the rules….no Jews allowed at the library or schools. People stood by, Jews included and thought ” this nonsense will end soon” and then came the ghettoes, the confiscating of Jewish homes and property and finally………the trains. To Aushwitz, Bergen Belsen, Sobibor and hundreds of others. Our young people see a movie like Shindlers List and think, well, with all our modern technology, the whole world will know what’s going on. The answer to that is….will they care? It’s started already….BDS in our most prestigious schools, civilized countries supporting BDS, nations standing by while Hamas sends rockets into Israel and then warns them not to retaliate! The world is silent. The UN is silent, the EU is silent! Welcome to Hitler’s dream!

    • Julian says:

      What is scary is that a politician like Bernie Sanders, a politician with a huge following, bought into the anti Israel propaganda and didn’t have a clue as to what the true facts were.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading The Crisis Of Anti-Zionism at Ottomans and Zionists.


%d bloggers like this: